As we previously reported, on August 14, 2026, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) published a final rule (the “Final Rule”) that made permanent the significant changes to the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reporting requirements that FinCEN had adopted on an interim basis in March 2025. Under the Final Rule, entities formed in the United States are no longer subject to BOI reporting requirements, and U.S. persons are no longer required to report or provide BOI to reporting companies where they are beneficial owners or company applicants. However, the Final Rule maintains the current framework with respect to foreign entities that qualify as reporting companies.
Foreign Reporting Companies
Under the Final Rule, a “reporting company” is now strictly limited to an entity (i) formed under the law of a foreign country, and (ii) registered to do business in any U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction by filing a document with a secretary of state or similar office. For example, if a foreign entity registers a branch office by making a qualification or doing-business filing in any U.S. state, the foreign entity, unless otherwise exempt, is a reporting company and must submit a BOI report through FinCEN’s system. FinCEN estimated that the Final Rule’s broadened exemption will reduce the number of entities required to report to approximately 0.06 percent of estimated reporters that were previously required to report under the 2022 regime. While this is a massive reduction in scope, foreign companies with economic ties to the United States must continue to analyze whether they are among the small population of entities that remain obligated to report BOI to FinCEN. Failure to comply can result in significant civil and criminal penalties.
Can a Foreign Reporting Company Be Exempt?
Registration to do business in the United States does not necessarily trigger a BOI filing. As we previously reported, the CTA and its implementing regulations include several exemptions from the definition of “reporting company” that cover specified categories of entities, including certain securities issuers, banks and other regulated financial institutions, tax-exempt entities, certain large operating companies, and subsidiaries of certain exempt entities. The requirements for these exemptions should be reviewed carefully because several contain conditions that may be particularly relevant to foreign entities that may otherwise be required to file BOI reports.
BOI relating to U.S. Persons Now Excluded
Even where an entity qualifies as a “reporting company” under the Final Rule and no exemption is available, a reporting company will only be required to report BOI on individuals who are not “U.S. persons”. The term “U.S. person” in the CTA cross-refers to section 7701(a)(30) of the Internal Revenue Code, and generally means a U.S. citizen, U.S. tax resident, or a U.S. partnership, corporation, estate, or trust. The Final Rule provides that:
- a foreign reporting company is not required to report BOI concerning any U.S. person, whether that U.S. person is a “beneficial owner” or a “company applicant;” and
- a U.S. person is not required to provide BOI to a foreign reporting company in connection with such U.S. person’s status as a “beneficial owner” or a “company applicant.”
How Can Non-U.S. Entities Minimize U.S. Beneficial Ownership Reporting?
For foreign reporting companies that are establishing or expanding U.S. operations, entity structure may provide the most straightforward means of minimizing or avoiding a CTA reporting obligation. Under the Final Rule, a “domestic entity,” meaning an entity created by the filing of a document with a secretary of state or similar office under the law of a U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction, is not subject to BOI reporting under the CTA. Accordingly, before filing a foreign qualification for a non-U.S. entity, such entity should consider whether its U.S. operations can instead be conducted through a newly formed U.S. subsidiary. Where appropriate, this structure can eliminate the BOI reporting obligation altogether, regardless of whether the U.S. entity is wholly owned by non-U.S. persons.
This does not mean that forming a U.S. subsidiary will always be preferable. Tax, regulatory, licensing, employment, contractual, financing, liability, and other considerations may point in the opposite direction. However, minimizing potential CTA reporting obligations should now be part of the initial corporate structuring analysis for foreign companies doing business in the United States.
Global Push for Beneficial Ownership Transparency
Looking Ahead: U.S. Structuring and CTA Compliance
The Final Rule significantly narrows the scope of the CTA’s BOI reporting requirements, but it does not eliminate the need for foreign entities to carefully assess their U.S. operations and organizational structures. Dorsey can assist foreign entities in evaluating whether their U.S. activities may subject them to the CTA’s BOI reporting requirements, including by analyzing U.S. entity structures, state registration requirements, and available CTA exemptions.
We will continue to monitor developments relating to the CTA and provide further updates as appropriate.
