No business welcomes conflict, but when disputes do arise, trying – and winning – cases is in our DNA. More than 75 attorneys in our Commercial Litigation Group represent clients in cases involving complex commercial disputes, the UCC, business torts, and virtually any other business conflict. We handle cases ranging from billion dollar disputes to matters of principle.
The skill, experience, and judgment that our attorneys bring to trials also make our Group highly effective in winning dismissals and summary judgments, obtaining favorable settlements, and finding creative solutions for matters of all sizes and degrees of complexity.
We try dozens of cases each year before judges, juries, and arbitrators, and our successes have been noted. U.S. News – Best Lawyers ranked us as a Tier 1 firm for our Commercial Litigation practice.
Our litigation group members practice in a wide range of areas. To see the variety of industries and disciplines of our core group members' practice, click here.
Litigation can produce an astonishing number of documents – email messages, word processing files, spreadsheets, legal agreements, memos – as an ever greater number of computer users leave an endlessly expanding trail of electronic records. And improved storage capacity means those records may well be kept indefinitely. LegalMine™, our e-discovery service, offers our clients a powerful tool to review huge amounts of documents efficiently, thoroughly, and accurately. This is a critical in-house tool – and an advantage we have over many of our competitors – through which we help our clients effectively manage costs.
Whether a case involves a courtroom or arbitration, our Commercial Litigation group can represent clients on a cost-effective basis. For a list of our core Commercial Litigation group members and the wide range of their practice areas, click here. A small sample of the hundreds of cases we have handled includes:
- Spinner Consulting LLC v. Bankruptcy Management Solutions, Inc., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 65 (3d Cir., Jan. 3, 2020), aff'g 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98577 (D. N.J., Jun. 12, 2019) (counsel for defendant, the largest provider of software services to Chapter 7 trustees, in dismissing plaintiff's class action complaint alleging price-fixing under §1 of the Sherman Act)
- Money Mailer, LLC v. Brewer, 2019 Wash. LEXIS 585; 2019 WL 4508353 (Sup. Ct. Wash. Sep. 19, 2019) (en banc). Represented national franchisor Money Mailer before the Supreme Court of Washington, which favorably interpreted that the language “fair and reasonable price” in the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act is based on what prudent franchisors and franchisees in similar circumstances would regard as an appropriate price.
- McGarry & McGarry, LLC v. Bankruptcy Management Solutions, Inc., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110264; 2018 WL 3218659 (N.D. Ill., July 2, 2018), aff'd, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 26764; 2019 WL 4197546 (7th Cir., Sep. 5, 2019); 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93133; 2017-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P 80,029; 2017 WL 2619143 (N.D. Ill., Jun. 16, 2017) (counsel for defendant, the largest provider of software services to Chapter 7 trustees, in dismissing plaintiff’s class action complaints alleging claims under §1 of the Sherman Act and 740 ILCS 10/3, the Illinois Antitrust Act price-fixing provision)
- Slater & Gordon (UK) 1 Ltd. v. Watchstone Group Plc (Defending a listed public company in a high profile £637 million claim for fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of warranty arising out of a sale of a number of its operating subsidiaries)
- Seattle Times Co. v. LEATHERCARE, Inc. v. Touchstone SLU LLC, No. 2:15-cv-1901-TSZ (W.D. Wash. 2018) (Dorsey was lead trial counsel for TB TS/RELP LLC (joint venture between Touchstone Development Partners and USAA Real Estate) in a month-long federal bench trial against the Seattle Times and an industrial drycleaner regarding environmental contamination. Our client secured a complete victory and was awarded millions of dollars in remediation damages.)
- Otello Corporation ASA v. Moore Frères & Company and Last Lion Holdings Limited  EWHC 2347 (Ch) (represented listed Norwegian software company Otello in its successful High Court action arising from Moore Frères & Co’s attempts to block Otello from selling its minority shareholding interest in Last Lion Holdings Limited for $53 million)
- Kedrowski v. Lycoming Engines, 2018 Minn. App. Unpub. LEXIS 403, 2018 WL 2293332 (Minn. App. 2018) (lead counsel for defendant airplane pump manufacturer in post-trial motions and appeal following $28 million jury award for plaintiff, the third biggest personal injury award in Minnesota state history. As a result of post-trial motions, jury verdict was overturned and judgment as a matter of law entered for defendant. Affirmed on appeal. On review by Minnesota Supreme Court)
- Thomas A. Berg, et al. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.,740 F. App'x 535 (9th Cir. 2018), aff'g 226 F. Supp. 3d 962 (D. Alaska 2016) (lead counsel for Honeywell in federal False Claims Act qui tam suit; summary judgment granted on all claims; affirmed by the Ninth Circuit)
- Bay Side Recycling et al. v. SKB Environmental et al. (Henn. Co. Dist. Ct., MN) (Lead trial counsel for solid waste disposal company in 3 1/2-week jury trial; jury verdict for defendants on all claims in May 2018)
- Global Access Investment Advisor LLC, et ano. v. Oscar Lopes, et al., 2017 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2150 (Sup. Ct., N.Y. Co., May 31, 2017) (counsel for defendant, Banif (Cayman), Ltd., a subsidiary of a large Portuguese banking group, dismissing all claims against it, including aiding and abetting a conversion of funds)
- Larson v. Gannett Co., 915 N.W.2d 485 (Minn. Ct. App. 2018) (Ground-breaking First Amendment trial involving claims of defamation against NBC affiliate and newspaper of general circulation by private citizen mistakenly arrested for the murder of a police officer in a small MN town. The case involves the applicability of the fair report privilege, First Amendment protection of the press, and issues relating to common law defamation under Minnesota law. Jury verdict in favor of media clients; reversed by judge in post-trial order and set for new trial; new trial order now on appeal.)
- Midbrook Flowerbulbs Holland B.V. v. Holland Am. Bulb Farms, Inc., 874 F.3d 604, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 21172, 98 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1623, 2017 WL 4799263 (9th Cir. 2017) (Lead appellate counsel for Dutch agricultural company in multimillion dollar international contract dispute involving meaning of “due process” in connection with the enforcements of foreign country judgments. Judgment for client affirmed.)
- Barapind v. Government of Republic of India, et al., 50 F.Supp.3d 1388 (E.D.Cal. 2014), aff'd,-- F.3d --, 2016 WL 7384023 (9th Cir. 2016) (affirmance of dismissal of action against our client, India, seeking $10 million in damages for alleged violation of international human rights treaty in connection with extradition of terrorist to India)
- GMI, LLC v. Asociacion del Futbol Argentino, 193 So.3d 60 (Fla.App. 2016) (As lead counsel for Argentine national football association, we obtained the dismissal of an action seeking $100 million in damages in connection with an alleged contract to televise Argentine national team football games worldwide.)
- Hoban v. Republic of Peru, -- F.Supp.3d --, 2016 WL 4718174 (S.D.Fla. 2016) (As lead counsel for Peru, we obtained the dismissal of an action seeking $11 million in connection with internal sovereign bonds issued by Peru relating to the economic crisis of the 1980’s.)
- B & R Supermarket, Inc. v. Visa, Inc., 2016 WL 5725100 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2016) (As lead counsel for national bank in suit alleging price-fixing conspiracy related to credit card security chips, we obtained the dismissal of all claims against our client.)
- SymQuest Group, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc., No. 15 CV 4200, 2016 WL 2855501 (E.D.N.Y. May 16, 2016) (Lead counsel to defendant business equipment supplier in action alleging that supplier's failure to provide spare parts, consumable supplies and online tech+B22:B25nical support to dealer acquired by competitor breached dealer agreement and tortiously interfered with dealer's customer contracts; motion for preliminary injunction denied and motion to dismiss granted)
- Collins v. U.S. Bank, N.A., No. 2:14-cv-07726-ODW, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13413 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2015) (As counsel for U.S. Bank in class action lawsuit brought under California Business & Professions Code 17200, et seq., we obtained the dismissal of all claims stemming from the purchase of forced hazard insurance.)
- Simmons v. Author Solutions LLC, 2015 WL 4002243 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 1, 2015) (Dorsey acted as counsel for defendant, the supported self-publication industry leader, and its parent, Penguin Group (USA) LLC, defeating plaintiffs’ motion seeking to certify a large nationwide class and state subclasses of authors regarding claims of deceptive trade practices.)
- OBB Personenverkher AG v Sachs, 136 S.Ct. 390 (2015). (As lead counsel for Austria’s national railway, we obtained a unanimous decision before United States Supreme Court dismissing a tort action on foreign sovereign immunity grounds under the FSIA. Established jurisdictional gravamen standard to be applied in actions against foreign states engaged in commercial activity.)
- Nissan of North Olmsted v. Nissan North America, Inc., 38 N.E.3d 500; 2015 WL 3963958 (Ct. App. Ohio 2015) (Lead counsel for defendant Nissan in add-point dispute. Plaintiff’s claims dismissed, affirmed on appeal.)
- Webster v. United States, 784 F.3d 1123 (7th Cir. 2015)(en banc) (successfully argued ground-breaking habeas case on behalf of federal death row prisoner)
- Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. Time/Warner Retail Sales & Marketing Services, Inc., 979 N.Y.S. 2d 69, 2014 WL 338977 (1st Dep’t, Jan. 28, 2014) (as counsel for plaintiff publisher, obtained a judgment in the amount of $3 million in favor of publisher for breach of the parties’ distribution agreement)
- Kamins v. The Empire Plan, et al. (Sup. Ct. Suffolk Co. 2014) (Lead counsel to health care plan and plan administrator in putative class action alleging violations of New York mental health parity statute; motion to dismiss claim asserting private right of action granted)
Industries & Practices
- Antitrust & Competition Law
- Class Action Litigation
- Construction Litigation
- ERISA Litigation
- Healthcare Litigation
- Intellectual Property Litigation
- International Arbitration & Litigation
- LegalMine Document Review Solutions
- Products Liability
- Securities & Financial Services Litigation & Enforcement
- Trusts & Estates Litigation