Brian Bell
PEOPLE

Brian Bell

Partner
bell.brian@dorsey.com

Overview

Brian assists clients in obtaining governmental approvals for controversial energy, natural resources, and development projects. As part of this work, he advocates for companies before local, state, and federal administrative and judicial tribunals.

Brian represents clients in administrative and judicial enforcement matters related to compliance with environmental laws and permits. Brian’s environmental enforcement work involves negotiating early resolution of enforcement matters with state and federal regulators. When early resolution is not possible, Brian litigates against regulators to reduce or eliminate penalties and corrective actions.

Brian also represents energy companies in obtaining routing and siting permits for large energy infrastructure projects. Brian’s natural resources practice involves helping mining companies with project permitting, investments, and acquisitions. Brian represents developers in obtaining local land use approvals and navigating environmental issues in transactions.

Education & Admissions

University of Minnesota Law School (J.D., 2013), magna cum laude

University of Minnesota (B.A., Political Science, 2008)

Admissions

  • Minnesota
  • Montana
  • Wisconsin
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Montana
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Clerkships

  • Minnesota Supreme Court, Honorable Alan C. Page, 2013-2014

Experience

Representative Work

Environmental Law

  • Represented clients in negotiating settlements with state and federal environmental protection agencies for alleged violations of environmental laws and permits. 
  • Negotiated a no-penalty administrative consent order between industrial client and the Environmental Protection Agency after the Agency initially proposed a six-figure settlement. 
  • Advised client on self-reporting violations of toxic release inventory (TRI) requirements, allowing the company to avoid a penalty. 
  • Northern Iron, LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Court File No. 62-CV-24-3170 (Minn. 2d Jud. Dist): Obtained a preliminary injunction preventing the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency from enforcing provisions of an administrative order that would have led to manufacturer closing. 
  • State ex rel the Associated Contract Loggers & Truckers of Minn. v. N. States Power Co., Court File No. 11-CV-17-2090 (Minn. 9th Jud. Dist.): Successfully won dismissal of a Minnesota Environmental Rights Act lawsuit by a trade association against an investor-owned utility seeking to prevent the utility from closing a biomass power generation facility.
  • Represented client in enforcement action, which was eventually dropped, before the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for alleged violations of Clean Water Act permits.
  • Secured favorable settlement on behalf of pet-food manufacturer in Clean Water Act citizens-suit matter. 
  • Assisted manufacturer in obtaining liability protection through Minnesota’s brownfields program.
  • Won an over 50 percent reduction in a metal-plating company’s unpaid sewer discharge fees.
  • Persuaded the Environmental Protection Agency not to pursue enforcement action against a company that had neglected to make a release report under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA).

Energy Law

  • Represented clients in numerous siting and route permit proceedings before Minnesota, South Dakota, and North Dakota regulatory commissions. 
  • In re Enbridge Energy, 964 N.W.2d 173 (Minn. Ct. App. 2021): Represented group of crude oil shippers intervening in a contested case for a certificate of need for the replacement of a crude oil pipeline. The certificate was granted and sustained on judicial review.
  • Tri-State Generation and Transmission Ass’n, 174 FERC ¶ 61,021 (2021) & 190 FERC ¶ 61,106 (2025): Secured acceptance by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) of generation-and-transmission cooperative’s revised generator interconnection procedures and Order No. 2023 compliance. 
  • Montana v. Talen Montana, LLC, 130 F.4th 675 (9th Cir. 2025). Represented investor-owned utility in district and appellate court against claims by the State of Montana that the State owned riverbed underlying client’s hydroelectric facilities. Obtained and defended judgment determining the State did not own the riverbed underlying nine of ten facilities at issue. 
  • Shell Energy N. Am. (US), L.P. v. FERC, 107 F.4th 981, 984 (D.C. Cir. 2024): Successfully defended favorable agency decision regarding wholesale electric price cap on judicial review. 
  • In re N. States Power Co., No. A15-1831, 2016 WL 3043122 (Minn. Ct. App. May 31, 2016): Successfully advocated for an investor-owned utility before a state utility board and appellate court related to its solar gardens program.
  • Crow Wing Coop. Power & Light Co. v. Great River Energy, No. A18-0471, 2019 WL 114200 (Minn. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2019): Won dismissal of the majority of claims brought by a distribution electric cooperative against a generation-and-transmission cooperative.
  • Renewable Energy Aggregators, 177 FERC ¶ 61,040 (2021); Letter Order, Arizona Sacaton Pumped Hydro Storage Project, P-14869 (Mar. 4, 2020): Represented mining company and pumped-storage developers in proceedings before FERC.
  • N. States Power Co., 168 FERC ¶ 62,028 (2019): Successfully applied to FERC for approval for an investor-owned utility to acquire several wind-energy facilities.
  • Represented clients in rate proceedings before state utility commissions.
  • Assisted client in filing for approval of its smart-meter technology.
  • Assisted an investor-owned utility in the purchase of an 80 megawatt, $143-million wind farm.

Land Use

  • Successfully overturned adverse decision denying approval of surface parking lot in central business district.
  • Secured denial of neighborhood appeal and petition for environmental review for a mixed-used development.
  • Represented a manufacturer in preventing adverse decisions in connection with a municipality's adoption of its comprehensive plan and obtaining approval for a street vacation.
  • Represented homeowner in successfully appealing denial of variance for setback requirements. 
  • Obtained rezoning and conditional use permit for education and arts center in exurban community. 
  • Successfully applied for conditional use permit for charter school in outlying community. 
  • Obtained planned development permit for developer of health care company in Twin Cities suburb. 
  • Completed land use due diligence for an investment company acquiring a hotel in an urban core.
  • Conducted land use due diligence for a real estate company seeking to invest in a mixed-use development.

Natural Resources Law

  • Advocated for mining company seeking to reverse adverse mineral leasing decision by the Department of the Interior.
  • Conducted due diligence for natural resource projects in the Midwest, West, and Alaska.
  • Represented mining company in disputing federal government’s withdrawal of minerals on national forest system lands.
  • Advocated on behalf of copper-nickel company in receiving government approval for a 211-mile right-of-way to the company’s mineral holdings and in mine permitting.

News & Resources

Articles

Energy Law: Month in Review - September 2025
Legislature Expands the MPCA’s Enforcement Authorities
Minnesota Energy Infrastructure Permitting Reform
Changes to Lobbying Disclosure in Minnesota
Uncertainty Looms: Minneapolis' 2040 Plan Hits (Another) Judicial Roadblock
D.C. Circuit Upholds FERC’s Broadview of PURPA
DIG Magazine - Fourth Quarter 2022
FERC Increases Regulatory Oversight of Investors With Officers or Directors on Public Utilities’ Boards
Locked Out: Zillow’s Failure to Provide Insurer Timely Notice of DMCA Takedown Notice Precludes Coverage Under a Claims-Made Policy
EPA and Corps Final Clean Water Rule’s Potential Impacts on Farming
OSHA Updates Reporting and Recordkeeping Rules

News & Press Mentions

220 Dorsey Lawyers Recognized in 2026 Best Lawyers in America, Lawyers of the Year, and Ones to Watch
Partner Brian Bell Featured in Multiple News Outlets for Insight on SCOTUS Case "San Francisco v. EPA"
201 Dorsey Lawyers Recognized in 2025 Best Lawyers in America, Lawyers of the Year, and Ones to Watch
Climate Change Disclosures—How Regulatory Compliance Leads to Future Litigation Risks
200 Dorsey Lawyers Selected for Inclusion in 2024 Best Lawyers in America, Lawyers of the Year, and Ones to Watch
Dorsey & Whitney Names New Partners

Podcasts

Climate Change Disclosures—How Regulatory Compliance Leads to Future Litigation Risks

Professional & Civic

Professional Achievements

  • Minnesota Board of Law Examiners (2021-Present)
  • Section Council – State Bar Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources Section Council (2017-Present) (Secretary 2021) (Treasurer 2022)
  • Board of Directors – Minnesota Supreme Court Historical Society (2017-Present)
  • Community Board – Douglas Dayton YMCA Community Board (2016-2021)
  • Board of Directors – Citizens League (2010-2016)
  • Board of Directors – African American Family Services (2010-2013)
  • Tubman Safety Project Pro Bono Attorney
  • Expungement Clinic Pro Bono Attorney
  • Housing Clinic Pro Bono Attorney

Accolades

Dorsey Pro Bono ChampionNorth Star Lawyer

  • Best Lawyers in America©, 2024-2026
  • Dorsey & Whitney – Scales of Justice Team Award (Housing Team), 2025
  • Consistently providing pro bono legal assistance to those in need through Dorsey’s Pro Bono program
  • Minnesota Monthly, “Top Lawyers in Minnesota,” 2024
  • MSBA North Star Lawyer, 2015-2016, 2018-2019, 2022-2023
  • Region 14 Best Petitioner Brief – National Moot Court, 2012
Brian Bell