Clint Conner
PEOPLE

Clint Conner

Partner
conner.clint@dorsey.com

Overview

CLINT HANDLES COMPLEX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MATTERS AND HELPS HIS CLIENTS ACHIEVE SUCCESS IN HIGH STAKES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LITIGATION.

Clint’s practice focuses on intellectual property with an emphasis on patent litigation, inter partes reviews, and patent enforcement strategies. Although he has remained focused on U.S. intellectual property law throughout his career, he brings an international perspective, having spent nearly five years representing companies in U.S. patent litigation while living and working in Tokyo.  Before attending law school, Clint was an engineer for three years with Lucent Technologies’ Bell Labs (now Alcatel-Lucent).

He has experience handling patent issues relating to Internet and networking technology, semiconductor manufacturing, hard disk manufacturing, medical devices, physician efficiency technology, LCD technology, rare earth magnets, digital cameras, optics, imaging and printing, wireless network protocols, GUI interfaces, navigation systems, visual search technology, online real-time auction systems, interactive programming guides, and software. 

Education & Admissions

University of North Carolina School of Law (J.D., 2003), Dean's List every semester

University of Michigan (B.S., Industrial and Operations Engineering, 1997), cum laude

Admissions

  • Minnesota
  • California
  • New York
  • United States Patent and Trademark Office

Courts 

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California,
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

Experience

Representative Litigation

  • Representing U.S. company asserting patent antitrust claims against a main competitor in the Southern District of Texas.
  • Defending multinational Japanese company in a patent infringement suit brought by a non-practicing entity in the Eastern District of Texas relating to semiconductor design.
  • Defending multinational Japanese company in a patent infringement suit brought by a non-practicing entity in the Eastern District of Virginia relating to Internet technology. Filed inter partes reviews challenging the patents-in-suit and successfully sought a stay of the case pending the IPRs.
  • Defending multinational Japanese company in a patent infringement suit over LCD panel technology brought by a non-practicing entity in the District of Delaware.
  • Defended multinational Japanese company in a patent infringement suit brought by a non-practicing entity in the Eastern District of Texas relating to network printing technology.
  • In the Matter of Certain Point-to-Point Network Communication Devices and Products Containing Same (ITC): Defended multinational Japanese company in an ITC investigation relating to Internet technology requested by non-practicing entity Straight Path IP Group. Shortly after the Administrative Law Judge granted our motion to strike, and less than two weeks before trial, Straight Path dropped its case in its entirety.
  • Battle Toys, LLC v. LEGO Systems, Inc. (D. Del.): Defended toy company LEGO and obtained Consent Judgment of Non-Infringement dismissing the case shortly before trial.
  • In the Matter of Certain Sintered Rare Earth Magnets, Methods of Making Same and Products Containing Same (ITC): Represented multinational Japanese company in an ITC action asserting patents relating to rare earth magnet compositions and manufacturing methods against 29 respondents, including Chinese rare earth magnet manufacturers. Took key depositions of the manufacturers at sites in Hong Kong and Korea. The case was dismissed after respondents agreed to settlements.
  • CyberSource Corporation v. Retail Decisions, Inc., et al. (N.D. Cal.): Defended Retail Decisions and co-authored a motion for summary judgment that resulted in one of the first decisions invalidating a patent for claiming unpatentable subject matter following the Federal Circuit's Bilski decision.
  • Intevac, Inc. v. Unaxis USA, Inc. (C.D. Cal.) and inter partes reexamination of the patent-in-suit: Represented Intevac in patent enforcement litigation against Intevac’s principal competitor in hard disk drive media manufacturing, and successfully defended the validity of the Intevac patent in inter partes reexamination. Intevac acquired the competitor’s hard disk drive media manufacturing equipment business and the litigation was dismissed.
  • H.I.G. Capital Management, Inc. v. Huntsman Gay Capital Partners LLC (M.D. Fla.): Defeated a motion for temporary restraining order in trademark litigation shortly before an important industry conference for the client.

Select Presentations 

  • Speaker, “The Efficacy of Post-Grant Challenges in Patent Litigation: A Panel Discussion,” 2016 Midwest IP Institute (September 2016)
  • Moderator, “Intellectual Property Rights and Global Business Decisions: A Panel Discussion,” Hon. Jimmie V Reyna IP Inn of Court presentation for IP Judicial Delegation from Pakistan, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis (August 2016)
  • Speaker, Seminar on “Use of IP by U.S. Competitors to Compete Against Chinese Companies,” cites in Beijing, Shanghai, and Chengdu, China (June 2016)
  • Guest lecturer, “Intellectual Property and the Medical Industry,” Health Law and Management Impact, University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management (February 2016)
  • Speaker, “AIA Trials: Expert Discovery through Appeal,” Dorsey Seminar (April 2015)
  • Moderator, panel discussion on “Challenging Validity at Patent Offices in EU and Asia,” 2014 CASRIP High Technology Protection Summit, UW Law School (July 2014)
  • Speaker, "Recent Developments in U.S. Intellectual Property Law," PRIP Symposium, Tokyo (November 2012)
  • Guest lecturer, "Introduction to U.S. Patent Law,” Summer Intensive Course on Intellectual Property, Osaka Institute of Technology (August 2011)
  • Speaker, "What Can Happen In E-Discovery," E-discovery legal seminar, Tokyo (2010)
  • Presented at various other venues in Tokyo on recent developments in U.S. patent law

Industries & Practices

International Arbitration & Litigation
Patent Prosecution, Portfolio Strategy & Management
Trademark, Copyright, Advertising & Brand Management
  • Energy
  • Health Care
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • International Arbitration & Litigation
  • International Trade
  • Patent Prosecution, Portfolio Strategy & Management
  • Technology Commerce
  • Telecommunications
  • Trademark, Copyright, Advertising & Brand Management

Professional & Civic

Professional Achievements

  • Board, Japan America Society of Minnesota (JASM)
  • Board, Lowry Hill Neighborhood Association

Community Involvement

Pro Bono

Clint frequently represents tenants in Hennepin County Housing Court.  As lead trial counsel, he recently defeated multiple counts of material breach of lease and successfully sought expungement of the record on behalf of a tenant wrongfully accused of assault and interfering with management.

Accolades

North Star Lawyer logo 

  • MSBA North Star Lawyer, 2016
Clint Conner